Hilters Foreign Policy Essay - 1226 Words

Hilters Foreign Policy A dynamic foreign policy played a fundamental role in Hitlers rule, his decisions often revolving around his foreign policy aims. Hitlers aims were ambitions, the globalist school of thought most notably Rausching believe his ultimate aim was simply the maximum of power and domination; namely ultimate power. Hitler in the future planning to gain Germen supremacy in the Middle East, Africa and finally in the USA after conquering Europe. Such notions however; as Noakes and Pridham state are based upon comments of vague expansion outside Europe to be found in Mein Kampf and Zweite Buck, not actions and are thus dubious. The more readily accepted and justifiable theory, held by the continentalist school of†¦show more content†¦He the dissolving of the Treaty of Versailles would lead to a united Arian race and opportunity for future Arian development and prosperity, a natural progression in his social Darwinist theory. In March 1935 Hitler admitted Luftwaft; the existence of an air force within Germany and issued a decree which stated Germany had no intention of further honouring the defence limitations of the Treaty of Versailles. Although the League of Nations condemned his actions forming a Stressa declaration their lack of dynamic action proved to Hitler that no power in or out of the League of Nations was willing to strictly enforce the Treaty of Versailles. Nor was anyone prepared to give the French convincing guarantees if a disarmament convention was agreed. The lustwaff was a precarious move for Hitler as it illustrated his lack of compliance and encouraged other to question his plan s. However it devalued the treaty of Versailles and allowed Hitler to evaluate the situation. Hitlers diplomatic collaboration with Britain through the Anglo-German naval agreement, which gave Germany the right to build a fleet of 35% of the Royal Navy, proved highly beneficial to Hitler. Such a step by Britain was a direct repudiation of Versailles, by one of its own signatories, significantly undermining both it, the League of Nations and the Strassa Front. Hitler had caused friction between countries, underminedShow MoreRelatedWas Hitler a Weak Dictator?4126 Words   |  17 PagesTim Mason, Hans Mommsen and Martin Broszat. Though structuralists do not deny the importance of Hitlers role, they tend to stress the fact that he exercised his power within certain structures that shaped, and in some ways placed limits upon, his policies. Some structuralists also argue that Hitler was indecisive, influenced by his cronies, and divorced from the day-to-day running of the Third Reich. Hans Mommsen even goes so far as to argue that Hitler was in some ways a ‘weak dictator. In orderRead MoreAdolf Hitler: Pure Evil Essay3113 Words   |  13 Pagescommander of Reichswehr. He was assigned to influence other soldiers to enter the German Workers’ Party called â€Å"DAP†. While at DAP, Hitler was introduced to Dietrich Eckart, one of the founding members of the occult Thule Society. Eckart became Hilter’s mentor and they exchanged plans with one another. One plan that both Hitler and Eckart decided upon was to change the name of the party to: National Socialist German Workers Party, also known as NSDAP. Along with changing the name of DAP, HitlerRead MoreEssay on The Positive Relationship Between Science and Religion6961 Words   |  28 Pagesalliance with political institutions. Jesuit intelligence collection for the Vatican is well known, but priests also had to work with foreign nations to promulgate scientific as well as religious activities. To secure permission to operate seismic stations, Jesuits either had to convince local governments that studying earthquakes was beneficial public policy or to cooperate with existing political designs.† Considering the devastation to Lisbon, there is little doubt that this was obviously a